Whose growth in whose planetary boundaries? Decolonising planetary justice in the Anthropocene
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract This critical analysis examines the geopolitics of planetary environmental injustice and imperative for systems change to address intertwined crises climate breakdown unsustainable economic growth. Climate has heightened attention uneven anthropogenic use abuse planet's biosphere common pool resources. Recent arguments by scholars suggest that various boundaries have already been breached, resulting in dramatic harmful socio‐ecological consequences. These trends raise crucial questions equity justice, especially concerning responsibilities impacts. By centring Global South perspectives, prevailing ideologies promoting hyperconsumption, overproduction waste are interrogated. The incommensurability socioecological justice with ongoing extractive exploitative growth paradigms, which contribute further transgressions boundaries, underscore urgency decolonising underlying colonial‐capitalist practices. entails a fundamental reformulation paradigms envision more just sustainable future, one dismantles oppressive advances justice‐oriented praxis.
منابع مشابه
FROM POLITICS OF WAR TO POLITICS OF PEACE – NORTHERN UGANDA: Whose War, Whose Peace & Whose Justice
متن کامل
The anthropocene: from global change to planetary stewardship.
Over the past century, the total material wealth of humanity has been enhanced. However, in the twenty-first century, we face scarcity in critical resources, the degradation of ecosystem services, and the erosion of the planet's capability to absorb our wastes. Equity issues remain stubbornly difficult to solve. This situation is novel in its speed, its global scale and its threat to the resili...
متن کاملWhose voice? Whose choice? Whose power?
Coercion in psychiatry stems from the historic inequality between the psychiatrist and the person who is designated as the "patient," even though he/she may not have chosen this role, and may not see him/herself as needing psychiatric attention. The psychiatrist has the power to define an individual as mentally ill, and then to confine and treat the person based on that definition. The user/sur...
متن کاملWhose Copy? Whose Rights?
This is the third installment in a series of editorials on the implications of open-access publishing for established publishing practices and stakeholders in scientifi c and medical research. T he questions, tensions, and social concerns surrounding copyright and the Internet are very different for scientifi c and medical literature than for other kinds of easily reproducible digital works. Pe...
متن کاملWhose News? Whose Values?
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opin...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Geo: Geography And Environment
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['2054-4049']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.128